[PW] Fanatical adherence to reference works
Paul Zimmerman
pzimmer at wcnet.org
Wed Apr 4 13:03:36 PDT 2007
All this talk about silly reference questions in the "Unusual/amusing
reference questions" thread has reminded me of something else. Sometimes
people will take a book to be the ultimate authority even against real world
evidence. I recall reading something a long time ago in this regard. I think
it was part of a non-fiction article, but it might have been a story.
There was some old Indian (as in Native American) answering questions about
his culture, and every time he was asked a question he'd leave the people he
was talking to and then come back and give them the information. Ultimately,
it turned out he was going and looking at a reference work to avoid giving
the 'wrong' answer and getting into a dispute. This was supposed to be an
example of trying to deal with "the white man's" obsessive adherence to the
written word over the real world. There could be plenty of local variation
in aboriginal cultures, of course, but he apparently had enough experience
with argumentative 'anthropologists' in the past that he would just use the
reference to avoid unpleasant disputes.
Can anyone recall what I might be remembering? And, of course, can anyone
recall other instances (funny or otherwise) of reference fanaticism? :)
More information about the Project-Wombat
mailing list