[PW] Request help tracing Rebecca West quotation in 1928 Saturday Evening Post
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Thu Oct 22 12:01:39 PDT 2015
brian whatcott scripsit:
> There! It is settled then: the first reading is obfuscatory on its face
> while the second is instead, provocatively revealing.
That's true, but does not count as a principle of textual evidence: plenty
of people say very obvious things. The principle is exhibited solely in
the fact that _interesting_ is a common word and _intersecting_ is not.
Quote Investigator didn't gain its more-than-stellar reputation by making
dubious assumptions about content. (You could argue, indeed, that a
published misquotation is as good a quotation as any other quotation,
and should be treated as a legitimate version of the text, but I don't
go that far.)
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You let them out again, Old Man Willow!
What you be a-thinking of? You should not be waking!
Eat earth! Dig deep! Drink water! Go to sleep!
Bombadil is talking.
More information about the Project-wombat