[PW] Websites for kids

Sylvia Milne sylviamilne at btinternet.com
Thu Nov 12 08:23:45 PST 2015

I used the Internet before the World Wide Web was invented, so your reply prompts me to quote

Teach not thy parent's mother to extract
The juices of the embryo bird by suction
The good old lady (long retired librarian)
Can this feat enact
Quite irrespective of the kind instruction. 

Seriously, this is the sort of thing I was looking for. A more lighthearted version for younger children would be nice. Perhaps one of you could compile one.  


Sent from my iPad
Sylvia Milne 

> On 12 Nov 2015, at 02:26, John Cowan <cowan at mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Sylvia Milne scripsit:
>> What I really want is "When I am searching the Internet, how can I
>> tell if a website is reputable?"
> This is like asking, "When I am searching the Yellow Pages, how can
> I tell if a plumber is reputable?"  If you live in a big city (and
> Internet City is the biggest), you probably can't, at least not directly.
> One approach is to check the sites you trust already, and whether they
> link (in a positive way) to the site in question.  Google PageRank is
> a simplified version of this.  Another is to ask savvy people (most
> of us know some) for personal recommendations about specific sites.
> In the area of Internet rumors, I recommend snopes.com.  Wikipedia has
> errors and biases, but the list of cited sources in a given article is
> usually excellent.  Yahoo Answers is not to be trusted.
> Otherwise, you can only fall back on common sense.  If a site provides
> a quotation like "The trouble with the Internet is that there are so
> many unreliable sources on it" and attributes it to Abraham Lincoln,
> you can pretty much write off at least that part of the site as a joke.
> Sites filled with spelling and grammar errors, unless they are about
> non-English-speaking countries or the like, are probably not reliable.
> Just employ the same sense of ordinary commercial prudence that you
> would employ when hiring a plumber, and you may be occasionally misled
> but will probably not be too woefully befooled.
> -- 
> John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan at ccil.org
> But that, he realized, was a foolish thought; as no one knew better than
> he that the Wall had no other side.
>        --Arthur C. Clarke, "The Wall of Darkness"
> _______________________________________________
> Project Wombat - Project-Wombat-Open
> list at project-wombat.org
> http://www.project-wombat.org/

More information about the Project-wombat mailing list